Therefore the skepticism around One Billion Rising as a
campaign comes as no surprise at all, and it seems to me to be a good thing.
Many legitimate questions have been raised thanks to this campaign: many have
questioned whether it makes a mockery of those who have been raped and abused
because of its central modus operandus which
is dance. Others have questioned how effective such a campaign might be, given
that it is a one day affair. These questions need asking and they also need
answers.
Certainly the OBR campaign is by no means a be all and
end all to domestic violence and rape. In fact that is not the mission of this
campaign. The mission is to create a heightened awareness, such as the world
has never seen in order that rape and VAW become a front and center issue
rather than a marginalized “women’s issue”. The increasingly brutal forms of
violence such as rape and post-rape mutilation of females and the regular use
of rape as a weapon of war indicate a rapid move towards the normalization of
violence against women and as such a more radical approach to campaigning
against this tidal wave of violence that threatens to cause irrevocable damage
to societies that in many ways are already broken is urgently needed. Dance is
used in this campaign because it is a radical form of protest. Its radicalism
lies in the fact that dancing requires that an individual takes control of
their body and channels their inner energy into moving that body as they choose
or as the music moves them to. This is radical because for the majority of
women their bodies belong to someone else, either through cultural rituals and
practices or through societal pressures and conditioning. Women’s bodies are
rarely allowed to exist for their own purpose. They are either reproductive
machines, owned by the men in their lives as beast of burden or sex machines or
psychologically enslaved through brainwashing media which reinforces certain
standards that define women’s bodies as beautiful or ugly. Dance is one
occasion that women can fully own their bodies and dance illicits joy and
initiates healing.
What I describe here about OBR is not new. Therefore it
is quite disingenuous when women like Marelise Van Der Mewe decide to vent
their personal issues with Eve Ensler by rubbishing a campaign that she herself
could not, with all her narrow mindedness and smug privilege, have envisioned.
She begins her “vapid” piece thus: ‘It’s a celebrity-endorsed
attempt to get a billion activists worldwide to take part in a choreographed
dance to end rape. The trouble is, it’s got bugger-all to do with rape at all.
And it’s unlikely to achieve anything, either.’ This statement alone is fallacy
because OBR is not about getting people to dance to a choreographed piece at
all. In fact in her own home country, there are communities that will not be
doing the OBR dance or reading any of the poems that have been suggested. She
is wrong again on the issue of OBR not achieving anything. She is unaware of
the conversations and ideas that have been borne as people gathered to get
ready for the event on the 14th. The event is a culmination of
months of sharing talking, and looking for practical solutions to make a
difference in people’s lives. Men are getting together to form community based
groups to push for progressive masculinities. Yes men are taking an active part
in this issue and this includes educating their children about respect not only
for women but for life in general. In another community, activists are working
with the police for the creation of victim- sensitive police units to deal with
victims of rape, from writing a statement, submitting evidence and
identification of victims as a way to make it easier for women to report rape. I
could go on, however I think the post OBR era will have numerous examples of
just what this campaign has ignited in terms of real and lasting change.
Van der Mewe’s concerns may have been legitimate, were it
not for her bellicose rants against Ensler and V-Day. What is quite shocking to
me is that her dislike for Ensler is so deep that she does not bother to do
much research about what V-day has done for the last 15 years with the money
that the organization has raised. A simple Google search would have given her
some insight into the work with women in the Congo, work with women and girls
facing female genital mutilation and work with girls in South Africa. However
in her volatile emotional state she quickly jots down some hogwash about no one
knowing what V-day does with its money. Get real! She fails to conceal her ire
, stating that only 56 people have registered for the event in the whole of
South Africa! Look who is totally out of touch with reality. If she had her
finger to the pulse of South Africa she would have noted that there are
thousands who have been working tirelessly in communities across the country in
order to have this event. She is clueless as to what victims of VAW and rape
need or feel or think about this campaign, because if she were not, she would
have realized that those who are mobilizing are the ones whose communities are
most badly affected by poverty and violence. many of them have been raped or experienced domestic violence. Of course she would not know this,
and if she did I doubt she would care. Her rather patronizing prescription- do as I do, blah blah blah- as she reels of a list of "things one can do about the issue of rape" as though she has done something amazing, is quite laughable. This, from the woman who has just railed against armchair activism. She openly states that she dislikes Eve Ensler and anything she touches. In other words: whether OBR has its merits or not, it doesn't matter because she chooses not to see them. How mature. show us the records that indicate a "lack of transparency" where V-Day and its funding is concerned. Her diatribe can be found here. A well researched article written by Gillian Schutte on Eve Ensler and the work that V-Day has done can be found here.
What might interest her is that in the Congo and
elsewhere, women who have been gang raped beaten, lost family members and
should in her books be lying in some corner waiting to die are DANCING!!! Yes
they are going to dance and enjoy themselves because in that joy lies freedom
to be themselves finally despite all the trauma they have faced. Merilene might
like to try dancing. It is liberating, and maybe she will befriend her vagina
and finally be able to disclose to the world her sexual orientation. Ensler
does not reduce women to their vaginas but rather uses the vagina as a way to
disempower reductionist patriarchy in which women matter only in so far as they
have a functional vagina. By having women get in touch with their bodies and
reclaim their sexuality, Ensler has been able to change many women’s view of
their sexual and reproductive health and their overall health also.
The bottom line is this: Women who take cheap underhanded
pot shots at other women who are actually doing something in this world to
better our lot, really suck. Former United states secretary of State, Madeline Albright, once said there is a special
kind of hell awaiting this kind of woman. I really hope so, because it is women
like this who set us back in our efforts to dismantle patriarchal structures
that keep us all in chains. What is even worse are those women who themselves
are doing absolutely nothing practical to further the cause, other than
complain and whine about existential/ ideological/ personal issues they have
with OBR and or Eve Ensler. Women who personalize issues
rather than be objective and analytical in their assessment before passing
judgment are nothing more than a nuisance and a distraction. Please go away
quietly and let those of us who understand OBR and who are truly passionate
about getting rid of VAW do so in peace.
By the way this piece is not in defence of Eve Ensler,
but it is in defense to a record of a body of work that has benefited thousands of
women, me included. If Marelise Van der Mewe can show us a record of her work,any work,
then I might be impressed. As its stands I think her poorly articulated “issues”
with OBR are just a personal rant full of baseless claims which leave her
looking like nothing more than a mean spirited individual with serious issues vis-a-vis her vagina or 'women's bits' as she calls it. “Sour
grapes” Marelise!